Assalamu 'Alaikum
Risk Management, the misguided subject that perpetuates the
rule of riba.
There is nothing wrong with risk management. As a concept it
was promoted even by the Prophet s.a.w. when he says mafhum, “ Tie the camel first
then place your trust on Allah” or tawakkal ‘alAllah. However it’s application
out of context has perpetuated the rule of riba. However before we go any
further let’s define riba in the most clear cut and easy to understand way.
Most people understand riba as interest over a loan, which is correct. However
a more exacting definition of riba is to define it within the context of
injustice in the allocation of risk between two partners in a supposedly
business relationship.
A key legal maxim in Islamic Muamalat is “AlGhunm bi alGhurm”
meaning rewards comes with risk. This is the key principle in Muamalat which
all Muamalat players are behove to observe. If we are in a maze the most clear
cut view to solve our predicament is to be able to see the maze from a bird’s
eye view. We will see where we are in the maze, where the exits are located and
how to get there. Similarly doing Syariah compliant business in today’s
business world we are in one mess of a maze.
This is not our business world, not our economic world. Islam
lost that lead a long time ago and most Muslims in the modern age finds themselves
engaged in a business world devoid and alien to Shariah demands, and yet we are
trying to do Shariah business! In trying to do Shariah business we adopt and we
adapt. While adopting and adapting sometimes we are not even aware the tools we
used are the wrong tools meant to achieve results which are the antithesis to
Shariah objectives.
What am I referring to? Risk management in Islamic Finance.
First we need to take the bird’s eye view as to whether the Islamic Finance we
are doing today is the Islamic Finance we are expected to do. Islamic Finance
should be designed from scratch and done within the context expected by the
Quran i.e. in an Islamic economy. If that cannot be achieved then Islamic
Finance should at least be done in an environment where it is haram for Muslims
to engage in riba and be customers of conventional banks. However if this basic
prohibition of riba for Muslims is not done then the Islamic Finance that arise
is more the end product of the environment it is operating in as opposed to
what Islamic finance should be.
Then we are hardly surprised if the Islamic bankers are
totally lost as to what tools they can and cannot use in Islamic finance. When
Islamic finance is 99.9% debt financing we are hardly surprised if their debt
risk management is all about recovering debts, at whatever human or economic
costs to their customers.
Where do Islamic bankers place Surah AlBaqarah ayat 280?
“And if someone is in hardship, then [let there be]
postponement until [a time of] ease. But if you give [from your right as]
charity, then it is better for you, if you only knew.”
How may Islamic bankers practise or put into effect Surah
AlBaqarah ayat 280? Is there a desire for them to put the verse into effect? Or
is there a fear that putting the verse into practise will put their business in
jeopardy? Will Islamic bankers give as charity since the Quran says is better
for them if they but knew. If they can’t and they won’t then we have to
acknowledge Surah AlBaqarah ayat 280 perhaps talks more of a qardhul hasan or a
loan to ease the hardship of someone then a loan in trade.
Is there therefore a loan in trade, or debt financing as Islamic
bankers are fond of referring them as?
If Ayat 275 specifically the part which says “….But Allah
has permitted trade and has forbidden interest….” is the premise upon which Islamic
debt financing is legitimised, can it be that five ayat later at Ayat 280 Quranic
rules are no longer suitable to Islamic financing? One would expect Islamic financiers
to embrace ayat 275 to 280 in toto, and not to pick and choose which ayat to
observe and which to ignore. What is the hukm of denying one ayat in the Quran?
Hence it is hardly surprising that Islamic financiers
practise risk management as if they are riba financiers. But do they realise that
riba financiers move goal posts to ensure they win all the time? Can Islamic
Financiers do the same? Are they allowed to do the same? Conventional lending
is not a business. Conventional lenders place ridiculous rules to ensure they
get their money back at all costs. That is because they practise money lending
and make no pretense they are doing anything else. Islamic bankers are
different; they declare they are not money lenders. They say they engage in
trade and observe Islamic principles in all they do. If that is so why do they
allow legal clauses that defeats the very basis of their akads?
No comments:
Post a Comment