Assalamu 'Alaikum,
Can we continue to ignore equity Islamic finance?
Can we continue to ignore equity Islamic finance?
An economic system is where economic units interact to
produce the optimal amount of goods and services needed by the economy. A key
factor introduced into economics by Shariah
is the legal maxim, AlGhunm bi AlGhurm meaning rewards comes with risk.
In Islamic muamalat one is not entitled to reward unless one
is willing to expose oneself to risk. This provides a fair formula for the
economic units. and the economy runs on equity instead of debt.
The problem with today’s economy is that we have allowed an
unnatural formula to persist in economic transactions. This is the formula of
debt. Instead of an equity transaction where both parties are exposed to risk
and reward we have accepted a situation where a particular economic unit is
given a special dispensation on risk or where one is spared of all risks.
One enters into the economic transaction where the price of
one’s capital is guaranteed profits and guaranteed return of capital. This is
an abominable formula to fair business transactions but we have accepted this unquestioningly.
Apart from it being a riba transaction we have also
conducted the sin of maysir or gambling because we gamble that our business
will be profitable. In an equity transaction we are spared the penalty of loss
but in the debt transaction we are penalised for loss.
The result of our acquisience to this unfair business
formula also resulted in the misallocation of wealth in society. We have just
ensured that those with money by the mere possession of money are forever
wealthy because of that unnatural formula of debt. To make matters worse we
have legislated laws to perpetuate this unnatural practise and courts upholds
this injustice in business practise.
We have also accepted a practise called risk management
which is a tool to perpetuate the wealth of the money lenders. We should have
confined ourselves to business risk
management but we have allowed money lending risk management to be the
definition of risk management.
The greatest risk to a money lender is the risk of his
borrower not repaying his loan. As he is ungoverned by any Shariah rules he is
free to set risk management rules that stacks against the borrower.
Since society has accepted money lending as a business, money
lending risk management is not questioned as an abominable practise. In the
name of risk management we perpetuate unfair conditions on the borrower. Shariah
does not accept money lending as a valid business therefore Shariah abhors
money lending risk management as much as it abhors money lending itself.
The problem with Islamic finance today is that it does not address
itself to the requirement of the above-said Maxim of rewards only with risk.
Therefore on technical Fiqh positions Islamic finance validates the extension
of debt to its customers via the various well known Islamic financing
principles .
The issue here is that whilst complying with Fiqh the end
result is the same to the receiver of finance if he were to take the
conventional loan. His Islamic financier does not care whether his business is
profitable or not. He has to return the capital extended to him at the agreed
date and on agreed intervals pay ‘profits’ whether or not he has made profit.
Questioned on this the Islamic financier will quote the
acceptability of buying and selling or trade by Shariah. Quite apart from the
dubious nature of current Islamic finance transactions whether they can all be
classified as trades we need to discuss
the issue of whether or not their compliance with Fiqh results in their
achievement of Maqasid Shariah or the objectives of Shariah?
It is perfectly possible in certain situations to comply
with Fiqh, yet unable to achieve the objectives of Shariah. Islamic banking is
in the field of Iqtisad or economy and deals with maal or property.
Within the broader context of achieving Maslahah or benefit
for mankind Shariah is meant to protect five values of man. These are his
religion of Islam, life, lineage, intellect and property.
Within the specific context of property Shariah demands
amongst others no transgression of property rights, an equitable distribution
of wealth, and a wide distribution of wealth in society.
An Islamic financing industry that confines itself to debt
financing will extend financing only to customers with collateral and with high
amount of capital. As these are characteristics of wealthy customers we find
Islamic debt financing guilty of making the rich richer and the poor poorer.
If this is the case, Islamic financiers have failed to uphold the objective of Shariah
in relation to wide distribution of wealth in society, and ensuring an
equitable distribution of wealth for society.
The Islamic financier also does not find it objectionable to
operate in a fractional reserve banking money creation system. Under this
system money are created multifold by banks when an initial deposit of money by
a customer is lent many times by the banking system.
In a debt based system where collateral and high capital are
prerequisites sought by banks these new monies tend to be given by banks to
rich corporates. When these rich corporates used the new money to buy real
assets they create inflation in society because the increase in money supply is
not matched by a correspondent increase in goods and services.
Thus the rich corporates have transgressed unfairly on the
property rights of society by forcing a loss on society’s purchasing power
through the inflation. Again Islamic debt finance have failed to uphold the
objective of Shariah of no transgression on the property rights of others.
If it is said these situations are forced on the Islamic
financiers by their operating in a dual system it needs to be addressed whether
it is really crucial to maintain this duality.
With the debt based international financial system heading towards its own Armageddon, Islamic finance can hardly be said to be an alternative if it is unwilling to shed debt in favour of equity.
With the debt based international financial system heading towards its own Armageddon, Islamic finance can hardly be said to be an alternative if it is unwilling to shed debt in favour of equity.
Muhammad Zahid Abdul Aziz of Muamalah Financial Consulting is
an international trainer and consultant in Islamic Finance with 23 years
experience in the industry.
The exclusive blog you have arranged. I like it very much. islamic debt company
ReplyDelete